|
I thought I would start a new thread on the resized Eastmans, rather than continue with Aahzz’s thread on the E3DE. If I have misquoted you in any way, Aahzz, I apologize, please correct me. For the sake of this discussion, I have not compared upper bout dimensions, but I will assume they will be proportionately smaller. Here is the response that Eastman gave to Aahzz when he asked if the E3D is smaller than previous Eastman dreadnought:
Thank you for reaching out to EASTMAN! All Eastman Dreadnoughts have the same size today, however since Bourgeois guitars joined the Eastman family of brands in 2019, we changed our Dreadnought size, to the same size as the Bourgeois Dreadnoughts, this has been a rolling gradual change. So any dreadnought you buy today, is all exactly the same size.You can find all the specs that we can share with you about your Acoustic guitar on our website: https://www.eastmanguitars.com/acoustic [Note: The website still shows the old specs as of March 14, 2023.]
From their website, the old Eastman dreadnought lower bout dimensions were 16” x 4 23/32” (407mm x 120mm) The Bourgeois website gives the lower bout width as 15 1/2” (394mm). They do not list the maximum body depth, but list the body depth at the neck (3 7/8”, 124mm). The lower bout depth that Aahzz received from a dealer measuring an E3DE was 4 1/2” (115mm). So, old Eastman dreadnought dimensions 16” x 4 23/32” (407mm x 120mm) vs new Eastman dreadnought measurements of 15 1/2” x 4 1/2" (394mm x 115mm): is that a game changer? Hard to believe that Eastman would make such a change if it negatively affected the tone/volume. Will they still be very good guitars, but a different sounding Eastman dreadnought that most of us now own?
Rod
|