I know you all would appreciate this... I think I prefer my e10D to my D18 standard. Both 2016. It may be I'm just not happy with the strings I put on the D18 this go around. I put uncoated Martin Authentic pb mediums. I usually did the old lifespan pb mediums . I wonder if I'm just not liking the new formula.

I also put retro lights on the E10D. Before it seemed too shrill in the high end and more overtones than the D18 with PBs but seems the retros dried up the sound just right.

The fact is, the E10D was always way more responsive and louder than the D18. We'll see. I may end up letting the Martin go and maybe see about an Eastman E10OM-tc. Would love opinions on those. Will the bass be too lacking for me? That is the question.

Anyway, that's my confession. I wouldn't dare post this on AGF. Could just be a string issue. That's entirely possible...

Two great voices. Song a bit sentimental and clichéd? Yes. Affecting? To me :- 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8A9Y1Dq_cQ

I’ve often wondered if anyone from Eastman watches this forum?

If they are...any plans to make an “S” style model?
When you do, I’ll be one of the first in line to buy.

I ordered this guitar about 1 month ago and I posted it then but I didn't have photos. I wanted to wait until I could do a couple of simple enhancements to the appearance. So, here are the photos. I took off the standard pick guard and replaced it with a custom pick guard, added a Jockomo Inlay sticker to the headstock, and replaced the stock strings with Ernie Ball Aluminum Bronze Light (11-52) strings. I know that some folks don't like the stickers but I think this one adds a nice accent.

What's really great about this guitar is THE SOUND! It really sounds like an all-solid-wood OM! IMHO, this guitar's sound is VERY CLOSE in quality to my E8OM or my E10OM and the tone is right between the two. It will make a wonderful travel and campfire guitar. Looks great, plays great, sounds great, what more could anyone want?

Attached Files

IMG_20200702_152549.jpg

File size: 632.48 KB

Downloads: 158

IMG_20200702_153051.jpg

File size: 473.74 KB

Downloads: 118

IMG_20200702_152903.jpg

File size: 539.47 KB

Downloads: 132

IMG_20200702_153358.jpg

File size: 677.48 KB

Downloads: 138

Just picked this up. Wow! What a nice guitar. I’ve had a couple of older AC range guitars but the new Eastman offerings are really something. I bought it for my “take anywhere “ guitar but it could easily be my number 1

Attached Files

8AB79AFC-A520-4752-B7DA-750B036F53A9.jpeg

File size: 1.35 MB

Downloads: 136

For the past year I've been intrigued by Maple guitars. To my ear they have the warmth of Mahogany with a little bite. Much like dark chocolate made with a touch of chili. So when the Acoustic Shoppe received a special run which included some Maple laminate dreadnoughts I had to check them out.
Not expecting a lot at the $399.00 price point, I stopped by the Shoppe. Masked up and fully sanitized I checked these out. First of all the Maple is beautiful. The top is listed as Stika but the tight grain and creamy color reminds me of Engleman. The fit and finish is very well done. The Rosewood for both the finger board and bridge are much darker than that used by some of the domestic companies. Bone nut and saddle, full comfortable C neck. Setup is spot on.
How do they play and sound? They punch well above the price point.
Since the Acoustic Shoppe is taking customer and employee safety very seriously, I didn't want to grab and play the Maple against the Koa or Cocobola. They are cleaning each instrument after a customer plays it. Fortunately the very talented Trent who was working that day was gracious enough to play them and let me hear the difference from the front side. That young man is good!
I did change the plastic pins to Ebony only because I don't like plastic. That had no discernable change to tone or volume, but every guitar is unique.
My wife came in the living room to check out the new guitar. She was amazed at the tone of this new acquisition and couldn't believe it was not a solid wood guitar as well as the price. She checked out all the beautiful figuring in the back, sides, and neck. It received the seal of approval.
Currently I'm waiting for the "new string zing" to wear off. In the meantime this little budget friendly guitar is getting a workout.
If you're looking for something that won't break the bank but can more than hold its own, put the PCH 3 on your short list.

My Joe bonamassa replica telly is coming together nicely.

I posted this in the introduction but putin it here too.

Hi Ya'll

I bought a mint used Eastman E10ooss.  Very nice condition. 

Nice tone,  look,  quality etc. but the action is a tad high.  I did notice this when I was checkin out the guitar but seemed ok or able to be dealt with.   I had just lowered a saddle for the first time on another guitar so I wasn't too concerned.  What I didn't notice was how the saddle was shaped.  This is hindsight.  I just passed over not really knowing what to look for in my zeal to acquire a new guitar.  I've heard all the good about E guitars and I was looking for something different/new.  Seemed ok to me.

Anyway...... 

As you E-fans know already,  the saddle is sloped on the ends to follow the bridge slope.  It is sanded flush - factory perfect.

how do I lower it or have it lowered with out it going below the bridge?   Doesn't seem possible unless a new one is put in and shaped or the top gets lowered/sanded.  Am I right?   

Also is it glued in?

My other guitar (carbon fiber travel guitar): I just removed the neck, pulled out the saddle and sanded it down a little - easy peasy.  That was my first try.  I'm guessing they all aren't that easy.

I'm not afraid to do stuff but this might be beyond on my skill level. 

Always something.

Thanks

Hi Ya'll

I bought a mint used Eastman E10ooss.  Very nice condition. 

Nice tone,  look,  quality etc. but the action is a tad high.  I did notice this when I was checkin out the guitar but seemed ok or able to be dealt with.   I had just lowered a saddle on another guitar so I wasn't too concerned.  What I didn't notice was how the saddle was shaped.  

As you E-fans know already,  it is sloped on the ends to follow the bridge slope.  It is sanded flush - factory perfect.

how do I lower it or have it lowered with out it going below the bridge?   Doesn't seem possible unless a new one is put in and shaped or the top gets lowered/sanded.  Am I right?   

Also is it glued in?

My other guitar (carbon fiber travel guitar): I just removed the neck, pulled out the saddle and sanded it down a little - easy peasy.  

Doin it on the Eastman might be/is beyond on my skill level.   I posted this in the acoustic forum as well..

Always something.

Thanks

 



Thanks!

I've been looking for pictures of the T64 online all the time, haven't pulled the trigger, because I want to play one before I buy (an my local guitar store hasn't had a T64 in yet, just some archtop models).
While looking at pics of the T64, I noticed that on recent ones, the bridge pickups seems to sit closer to the bridge (like on an ES330 - in most reviews, it was pointed out that the bridge PU of the Eastman has a fuller sound due to the extra distance, compared to an  ES330...)
Did anyone else notice this?
Here are some pics - I drew lines from the tips of the dogear covers to the notches of the f holes, to show the difference:

Attached Files

t64a.jpg

File size: 278.22 KB

Downloads: 91

t64b.jpg

File size: 282.55 KB

Downloads: 205